The Parable of the Stick
A man was walking through the woods with friend when his friend fell and twisted his knee. Seeking some way to continue to their destination, their eyes fell upon the coppice of hazel alongside the path.
The man realised that a market need had been created, in which at least one person has an urgent requirement for something that can be supplied, and the features can be specified: it must enable one to walk, be portable, help reduce pain and be available immediately.
While his friend sat and cursed, the man took his penknife and cut a 2m length of hazel, roughly chipping the ends and snapping the wood to about his own height.
The man knew that this was only a prototype. It roughly met the user criteria, but was unfinished in many areas. The main advantage that it had was that it was available to be tested by the user there and then.
Taking the stick to his friend, and helping his friend to his feet, they laughed, shared some jokes about how fortunate they had been not to have this accident befall them beside a manure heap, and then, using the stick, his friend started to limp forwards: step, drag, stick. Step, drag, stick. And on they went for a few metres.
“This stick is too long for me, as I am only 1m78 tall”, said the friend. “This stick has rough ends, and chaffs at my hand”, the friend said. “This stick is a little thin, and bends when I put my weight fully on it” complained the friend.
The man smiled. He smiled because he knew that immediate user feedback was pure gold, and that all friends were customers, and all customers were friends. He was already having ideas. So he rested his friend again, marked a height on the stick where his friends hand naturally fell, and walked off into an oak Coppice.
The man knew that the prototype could become an alpha product if he listened to user feedback and applied his own common sense.
He took his knife, and cut a shorter, stronger, thicker, oak stick. This time he carefully bevelled and rounded the ends with his pocketknife. It took a little longer than before, but the result was a sturdy and comfortable walking pole.
They were able to walk on for nearly a kilometre this time. At the end of that, home was in sight. “You know,” said the friend, “this is a good stick, and I would like to keep it, and always have it with me, in case I should fall when I am alone. You won’t always be there to make me a stick.” The man smiled more. He had found a product and made it fit the market need. His friend went on “it would, however, be so much better if the handle fitted my hand, as I now have a blister there, and if it had my name carved in it, so all will know it is mine.” This, the man did.
He now had a beta product, and he happily rewarded the early adopter and market tester with free gifts and services, as he knew the friend would soon tell others.
At home, he told his family the story, and they all wanted sticks too.
Back in the woods the next day, the man, and his friend together cut several sticks, and fashioned them with smooth handles, round ends, and in various lengths and thicknesses. He explained to his friend: “while we have a good idea that sticks help people walk, and people like them, we don’t know exactly who will want sticks, or why, so we are going to test the market with lots of similar, but slightly different sticks, and see what happens. I call this ‘testing alternatives’ or ‘comparative testing’ ”
Back at home, he got his family, and his friends family, to chose sticks and come for a walk. His son chose a thinner stick, better to whip down nettles with (as he had no need of a stick to walk). His wife chose a stick with nicely coloured bark and the best carved handle. Others came, and each was given a stick to suit, but only in exchange for a conversation about why they chose that particular one, and a promise to come back after the walk and say what it was like.
The following day, armed with feedback from many people, the man and his friend set to work on just three types of stick. “I can’t satisfy the whole world,” said the man, but I can make a lot of sticks that people actually want.”
...
Twenty years later the man and his friend were reminiscing in a nice hotel bar. “Who would have guessed,” said the friend, “that in just 20 years, the invention of the stick would have led to all this! We have forests of hazel and oak being coppiced by foresters. The knife and toolmakers are placing strain on the mines for fine ores to make better blades. There are stick vendors near every path. There is even a cult of metal badge makers, and leather handle wrappers, for goodness sake!”
“Ah,” said the man, “I did guess.” And he smiled. “I knew that if we got the first product design right, under pressure, and in association with real users, then we would have a great product. I knew others would differentiate the stick to suit other purposes, (even dibbing holes in the ground and acting as a horse whip). I knew how the ecosystem of business works, and how others grow up to service and enhance a good product. Most of all, I knew that if I could make my friend happy when he was in pain, then what I made was good, and would thrive and prosper.”
Finishing their drinks, they took up their sticks, now too old men, and limped off down the rough track home.
